I
cancelled my Boston Globe this
morning. Me, the newspaper junkie.
In the past 15 months rates have doubled. It is now well over $600/year to
subscribe. To a paper that has, in the
same time period, shrunk in
size.
I
decided it wasn’t worth it. Especially
when I can subscribe via my Kindle for only $120/year. It was a no-brainer. I will now be a Kindle subscriber to the Globe.
A
few weeks ago I posted that Facebook was my paper, and even in the past few
weeks that function has, for me, increased.
I get news from NPR in my FB news feed. And at least once a week I hear from
organizations that are local to me, such as Historic New England or the Thomas
Crane Public Library, reminding me about upcoming programs.
And
I projected that, in the next few years, all of us would have to get used to
newspapers disappearing . . . especially metro dailies.
Reactions
were, shall we say, visceral. Some wrote
in that newspapers had become irrelevant to them because they were already old
news by the time they arrived. I agree
as many times when I read the Globe I
find stories that I read the day before online.
Others
bemoaned the loss of quality news. Where
would they get it, if not from the paper?
First
and foremost, we should keep in mind that most newspapers have never had news
as their primary business. The majority
of their revenues come from advertising, putting them in the business of print
advertising more than anything else.
That revenue model has collapsed, and with smaller revenues they are
unable to keep up the quality of the newsroom.
(Note: If I felt the quality of
the news in the Globe was worth
$12.25/week, I would gladly pay it. The
quality is not there.)
But
the loss of daily metro newspapers
does not necessarily mean the loss of quality news. NPR is stronger than ever, providing quality
news from the US and around the world in three formats:
live radio; audio streaming/podcasts; and online articles. Some periodicals are providing juicy, stellar
reporting, such as The Economist, The Atlantic, and now Newsweek, which revamped itself only a
few weeks ago, improving their journalism many times over. Wire services, such as AP and Reuters, have
boots on the ground all over the world. And
I doubt I am the only person geeking out by watching PBS’s News Hour.
Additionally,
hyper-local papers, such as my Quincy Sun,
are still doing fairly well, providing quality community news that is important
to me.
So
quality journalism is still going strong, but there is a gap I wonder
about. Metro and state news (including museum coverage). In Boston, we have relied on the Globe to
uncover corruption and scandal, lately centering around state politics. Our excellent NPR station covers this as
well, but not to the same depth.
What
will happen if (and I project, when) the Globe
stops printing? Who will fill the
gap? Some papers have ceased printing
and gone to an online-only model, focusing on metro and state news. Other cities that still have dailies have
seen competition from very small, often nonprofit, websites that focus on
investigative journalism. These trends
will likely increase, and likely increase reporting on arts and culture along
the way as arts and culture reporting draws readers. I don’t rule out the possibility of
high-quality metro weeklies either. But
we are seeing new mediums for metro news that are starting to fill these needs.
Like
many others, I don’t relish the idea of sipping my morning cup of tea over my
laptop. That is not how I want to start
my morning. Which is why, for now, I
like my Kindle, and why I am switching my Globe
subscription to it. I already get the Wall Street Journal via Kindle, and have
found the navigation experience to be similar to that of the actual paper. I still flip through and scan every article (skipping
the “boring” sections, just like if I had a hard copy). Maybe handheld readers will take the place of
paper copies, and provide subscription revenue, for news outlets. Maybe something else will happen.
So
I am not worried about the death of quality journalism. There is a need and a demand for it. But newspapers? Looks like I am joining most of my 30-something peers and doing without.
What do you think? Is there anything you disagree with? Or do you
see these trends playing out as well in your community? Click on “comments” below to share. (If you
are reading this from your e-mail subscription to the blog, please go to our blog's
website to add a comment.) Please include the name of your museum as
well!
-Susie